mj12games.com

Hmmm, I'll see what I can do. I really ain't keen on taking pics of me though (to the level of "huge pit opening in stomach"--I do my level best to not have pics taken of me if I can help it), and just wondering how else I could do it so's I don't have to inflict myself on some poor unsusp...

Thanks for telling me. Unless there's any actual rules I'd need from the book that would only be from that book, I probably won't bother--the email route is unlikely to yield results, and I'm not that keen on doing selfies or having pics taken of myself. I'm sure I'll probably be losing out, but I ...

I've gotten mine from ADB by emailing them at marketing@starfleetgames.com. They replied and asked for the email associated with your DriveThru RPG, or Wargame Vault account and a selfie of you with the product. Had the PDF within a day. Thanks for telling me. Unless there's any actual rules I'd ne...

How does the 'free PDF' work? I mean, I got the Admiralty edition version of RA, but from cricket as the version I paid for didn't come through (still hasn't--I guess someone round here has a free copy of the book).

I would guess that it's because it might be hard to accurately cost--cricket has said as much (I think) when talking about other 'area-effect' modes such as ELINT

No...I've also thought of something along those lines--it certainly would allow a more true-to-source-material conversion of B5...

Would it be related either to the size of the weapons (a la FireCon/LRS) or be based on the shield factor, or even be a straight-up SU cost (say, 100SUs)? The more natural thing is to go with a percentage of the weapons SUs--similar to the FireCon SU/ORat cost. It would affect non-Defensive weapons ...

An idea I had for a potential SUE Escort trait, which would make it into more of a tactical escort, and combining it with the Defensive weapon trait which, at the moment, is useful only for defending the ship itself (based upon my reading of the rules, which could be in error) Any ship equipped with...

Okay, thanks. I think I had the older rules stuck in my head--again--because I've been making sure my Dfn weapons have a decent shot of hitting by giving them 2+ ACC, Dfn and Pnp, thinking that gave a 66% chance instead of a 83% chance.

So, just to be clear:

A R-3, ACC 3+, 1/1/1 weapon with Dfn and Pnp, defensively firing at a fighter flight, would hit on a 3+, not 4+?